Craigo Posted Friday at 08:33 PM Posted Friday at 08:33 PM Hi all. I wanted to build on a post couple of months back that mentioned this early 2025 study in Annals of Neurology which found that Oncostatin M (OSM) was significantly elevated across all forms of cluster headache (CH), episodic in cycle (ECH), episodic in remission and chronic (CCH) when compared with controls. Distinct Alterations of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Cluster Headache Lund, N. L. T. et al. Annals of Neurology. 2025 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39981939/ Interpretation: Findings show that the immune system is altered in all 3 states of cluster headache compared with controls. Oncostatin m was elevated, constituting a promising target for future studies. The distinct alterations between episodic and chronic cluster headache are striking and urges further research of the immune system in cluster headache to better understand its potential role in prediction of disease activity and treatment response. OSM belongs to the interleukin-6 family of cytokines which are signalling molecules released by cells to facilitate communication within the immune system and the body, acting as messengers and binding to receptors on other cells to trigger responses like inflammation, cell growth and immune cell activation. OSM is produced mostly by activated monocytes and macrophages along with T-cells once the immune system is already engaged. Triggers include microbial products such as lipopolysaccharide acting on toll-like receptors, upstream cytokines like IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 as well as T-cell activation itself. In other words OSM typically appears as a second-wave signal once innate and adaptive cues are already active. After its release OSM signals through receptor complexes that require gp130 subunit, a shared hub for the IL-6 family. OSM pairs gp130 with either OSMR or LIFR receptors which activate Janus kinase enzymes (JAKs). JAKs phosphorylate STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) and activated STAT3 then enters the nucleus to upregulate genes for chemokines, adhesion molecules and matrix metalloproteinases. Short-term controlled activation of this pathway is essential for tissue repair but sustained persistent activation may lead to detrimental effects including weakened barriers, leukocyte recruitment and ongoing systemic inflammation. In Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis OSM has been shown to drive stromal activation and barrier dysfunction and high levels of OSM are a predictor of poor response to anti-TNF-α therapies. The CH study by Lund and colleagues suggests a similar kind of hard-to-quiet inflammatory program in the cranial milieu of CH patients regardless of whether or not they are in active cycle. So what may drive the persistent upstream activation that induces OSM in the first place? This wasn't discussed in the article but one source that may deserve attention is the emerging gut-immune-brain axis. As explored in my earlier post, a growing body of literature in migraine describes altered gut and oral microbiota, reduced microbial diversity, links to markers of intestinal hyperpermeability and bacterial endotoxin exposure as causative agents in migraine pathology. While migraine and CH are distinct disorders both share neuroinflammatory components, cytokine involvement and respond to many of the same treatments, is it reasonable to ask whether dysbiosis may help maintain the triggers that induce OSM expression? And if so what implication does that have on future treatment strategies for CH? And where might the Vitamin D regimen fit into this picture? The active form of Vitamin D, calcitriol, binds to the vitamin D receptor in immune and barrier cells and influences the expression of hundreds of genes. It suppresses NF-κB and MAPK signalling, promotes regulatory T-cells and IL-10 and strengthens barrier integrity by upregulating tight junction proteins in epithelial and endothelial cells. Building on Pete Batcheller’s hypothesis, maintaining sufficient blood levels of Vitamin D3 may help downregulate some of the upstream drivers of OSM expression while counteracting OSM’s disruptive effects on barrier function. Supporting this idea, work outside the headache field has shown that calcitriol can shift macrophages from an M1 pro-inflammatory state toward an M2 reparative state, reducing the production of OSM, TNF-α, and IL-6. A balanced view is important. The 2025 study identifies OSM as a persistent signal and points to specific differences between chronic and episodic CH. It did not identify a cause and it did not test interventions. The migraine-microbiome literature suggests dysbiosis as one possible upstream driver but translation to CH is yet to be explored. Other papers from this author on CH for your interest. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Lund+NLT&cauthor_id=37667192 Includes an article titled "Current treatment options for cluster headache: limitations and the unmet need for better and specific treatments-a consensus article" which concludes "We find that there is a great and unmet need to pursue novel and targeted preventive modalities to suppress the horrific pain attacks for people with cluster headache." 4 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.