Leaderboard

Can atogepant be a preventive treatment for cluster headache?-Insights from a case series Catarina Serrão, Filipa Dourado Sotero, Linda Azevedo Kaupilla, Isabel Pavão Martins Published in Headache on October 3, 2025 Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15066 Abstract: Cluster headache (CH) is a disabling primary headache disorder with limited therapeutic options. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is known to be involved in CH pathophysiology; however, except for galcanezumab (300 mg) in episodic CH, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies did not reduce CH attacks in randomized clinical trials. Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, CGRP receptor antagonist, which is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. Here, we describe four case reports of CH (two episodic CH and two chronic CH), unresponsive to previous prophylactic treatments, who responded to daily atogepant (60 mg). Chronic CH cases were refractory to subcutaneous galcanezumab. In one case, a reduction to atogepant (30 mg daily) resulted in recurrence of headache attacks, which subsided on reintroduction of the initial dose. No serious adverse effects were reported. Despite the limited number of cases and the open retrospective design, our case series suggests atogepant as a possible prophylactic treatment for CH. Further research on CGRP signaling in CH and the implementation of well-designed clinical trials are necessary.

Hi CHfather - thanks for stopping in. This is the first case series I am aware of looking at a gepant and CH, in this case Qulipta / Atogepant. There is a trial looking at Nurtec / Rimegepant as a preventative therapy for CH. Ubrelvy / Ubrogepant is more an acute treatment owing to short half-life makes preventive use impractical and may not act quickly enough for acute CH attacks. I haven't read anything about the third generation gepant Zavegepant, again an acute treatment via nasal spray. I haven't really followed patient feedback on any them tbh. I think this case series, if anything, may provide some context for clinicians considering where to next for refractory CH patients non-responsive to other treatments, including anti-CGRP mAbs like Emgality / Galcanezumab - this suggests that atogepant may be worth a try. I imagine there may be a tendency to think if a mAb hasn't previously worked or stopped working as was the case for one of the cases, a gepant is unlikely to either. That being said, ya'll know I have had success with the vitamin D3 anti-inflammatory regimen and my personal view would be to exhaust the patient led treatments options that we have (busting + regimen) paired with abortives (oxygen and more recently DMT) before considering one of these new treatments because I am somewhat adverse to risk and there is no long term clinical data on their safety. For refractory patients for whom my heart truly aches, this may offer some hope - still, an early signal and a small case series.

Interesting, thanks for posting this. My Neuro has prescribed this for me at 60mg. I’ve not started just yet as I’ve been having some success with busting with 5-MeoDalt. Down to 1 attack per week and low pain shadows between. I was considering adding this layer on top. The cgrp blocker side effects of constipation and hair shedding give me the fear also :/

We have such an amazing community and it's hard to just pick a few people, so for our 20th we picked a few extra But seriously we have the best community- just wanted to give a shout out to these amazing people!

The recording is on our YouTube channel if you'd like to watch.

PACAP-38 in Cluster Headache: A Prospective, Case–Control Study of a Potential Treatment Target Marie-Louise K. Søborg, Nunu Lund, Agneta Snoer, Mads Barloese, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Anja Sofie Petersen Published in European Journal of Neurology on September 26, 2025 Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.70341 Abstract: (partial selection) This large-scale study demonstrated increased PACAP-38 levels in all disease states of cluster headache compared to headache-free controls, strengthening the hope of a possible effect of PACAP-38 targeting treatments in future trials. The lacking correlation between PACAP-38 and CGRP levels should be interpreted with caution and needs to be investigated in future studies.

Here is a screenshot from one of the authors posts on LinkedIn. The research coming out of the Danish Headache Center is outstanding, I have recently shared the findings of their paper identifying the distinct cytokine profiles that distinguish eCH from cCH and also found that Oncostatin M was elevated in all 3 CH states.

In the US, the brand name for atogepant is Qulipta. In the EU, I think it's Aquipta. @Craigo, thank you for this (and for all your other great contributions to substantive knowledge about CH)! I notice that Ubrelvy and Nurtec are both also gepant formulations. Might we imagine that they would also help (it seems from the abstract that the contrast in this study is with galcanezumab (Emgality))?

ABSTRACT: Classic psychedelics and the gut microbiome interact bidirectionally through mechanisms involving 5-HT2A receptor signaling, neuroplasticity, and microbial metabolism. This viewpoint highlights how psychedelics may reshape microbiota and how microbes influence psychedelic efficacy, proposing microbiome-informed strategies such as probiotics or dietary interventions to personalize and enhance psychedelic-based mental health therapies. Psychedelics and the Gut Microbiome: Unraveling the Interplay and Therapeutic Implications https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00418 A fascinating new view-piece synthesizing the current literature exploring psychedelic / gut / microbiome interaction in the context of depression. Wang and colleagues emphasise that "the baseline composition and functional state of the microbiome can shape psychedelic pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy, while the psychedelic experience itself can remodel the gut microbiome in ways that influence ongoing physiological and psychological adaptation." At the cellular level they note psychedelics suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α through 5-HT2A receptor-mediated inhibition of NF-κB signalling: "this immunomodulatory action establishes an anti-inflammatory milieu that favors the growth of beneficial commensal bacteria." Compounds such as psilocybin and DMT "reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and enhance epithelial barrier integrity, promoting the expansion of anti-inflammatory taxa." They note, the microbiome is not a passive bystander: "gut bacteria express a variety of enzymes capable of biotransforming these substances, thereby shaping their pharmacokinetic profiles. For instance, Bifidobacterium species have been shown to affect the metabolism of DMT, potentially altering the intensity and duration of ayahuasca experiences. Similarly, in vitro studies have identified bacterial strains that dephosphorylate psilocybin into its active form, psilocin, suggesting that individual differences in microbiota composition may underlie variability in therapeutic response." Wang et al. refer early human data noting that "although human studies remain limited, early observations suggest that psychedelic treatment may be associated with alterations in fecal microbial diversity in patients with depression." These observations support what the authors call a "systems-level perspective of psychedelic therapy - one that encompasses not only neural targets but also immunological, endocrine, and microbial domains." The article is behind a paywall, send me a message if you'd like a copy of the article. For more reading the article cites this paper "Seeking the Psilocybiome: Psychedelics meet the microbiota-gut-brain axis" https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9791138/ In the context of CH, with new evidence of persistent immune-inflammatory activity suggests psychedelic therapy not as acting solely on the brain but by potentially intersecting with the upstream gut-barrier-immune processes that maintain systemic inflammation that are now attributed as a causative agent in migraine. The paper also goes some way to positing a possible reason for the variations we see in busting efficacy. This area of research is fascinating and I think the piece provides a further and new angle as to the role gut health may play in CH alongside recent findings in migraine although there is much road to travel before we have any concrete evidence of this. Still mulling my thoughts, all I offer here is a view - always interested in yours. With respect, Craig.

It was again an awesome time and great to se it growing over the few short years I have attended. Many more Doctors Authors and Vendors. Most of all a bunch of fun happy clusterheads from literally all over the world. Hope you all can make it next year.. Bring a friend and leave with 100 new ones.